Note: This is the second of a series of posts I am writing about online dating. If you missed the first one, be sure to check out it before reading this one.
As I mentioned in my previous post, the rules that apply to offline dating is equally applicable to online dating. Just because meeting people online is different and more efficient, doesn’t mean that it is governed by a new set of rules of engagement. For that reason, first impression is just as critical even if the medium of exchange is casual.
Before we get into the nitty-gritty, it is worthwhile to mention that men are more visual whereas women are more verbal. That is not to say men are not attracted to women who write well or that women are not attracted to nice looking gentlemen. But as a rule of thumb, women are more attracted to men who have a way with their words, while men tend to gravitate towards women they find good looking.
Having said, that, I’ve confirmed the following with my small sample of friends: more often than not, the way a woman judges whether a profile is worth the pursue is how much information she can gather from the words on the page. In general, the more the merrier. So if you have a choice of writing one paragraph versus four, write four. But simply having more words won’t cut it. The point is how well can a guy convey who he is in the space he was allotted to talk about himself, not how verbose he needs to be to get his points across.
Rather than talk about it, I thought I would show an example of a rich profile (note the number of words as well as the language this person used to describe himself — every word is deeply meaningful):
“Life for me is all about balance, being open-minded and trying everything once. You’re just as likely to find me at the theater, symphony or opera as at a crowded live show up front with ear plugs in. You might see me sipping Pinot at a gallery downtown, and then run into me gawking at fire-spewing art cars on the playa at Burning Man.
“I relish the comforts of home, but have been known to travel for months at a time with only my backpack, my camera, and antimalarial pills. I’m mostly a city boy, but love skiing off steeps, diving into bodies of water, and feeling sand on my skin.
“I can be cynical and sarcastic with the best of them, but those who know me well think of me as a romantic idealist with a soft gooey center. I can be independent and reflective, but have a wild side that comes out to play hard when the mood strikes.”
On the other hand, here is a profile that is sorely lacking in substance:
“i’m a pretty well-rounded guy – smart, athletic, and artistic. i’m into the outdoors. i can re-model a house.
i try to be conscious of how i live my life and how i treat people. i try to spread happiness when i can.”
The difference between the two profiles is how concrete a picture they each painted. The first profile provided visuals using words; instead of just describing who he is with adjectives, he painted the kind of person he is with what he likes to do. After reading the profile, I immediately got a sense of who he is without ever meeting him. On the other hand, the second profile not only used very few words to describe himself, his description is hardly memorable or differentiating from most of the profiles out there.
Another aspect of first impression is how you choose to present yourself. I’ve seen too many pictures of men drinking beer in wild party settings. There’s absolutely nothing wrong with posting pictures like that, but know that those kinds of pictures are mostly attractive to people who are like that themselves. If that’s the kind of person you hope to attract, then by all means. Since I am not a party girl myself, I tend to stay away from profiles blasted with party photos. It’s simply not my cup of tea!
Finally, if the online dating sites allow you to choose your handle name, choose the name wisely. Avoid words that convey pretentiousness or larger than life sentiment unless, of course, you are trying to attract people who like those qualities in a mate. For example, calling yourself a “Prince” or a “SuperStar” is a big no-no, as is describing yourself as “sexy”, “freak” or “angry”.
Have more to add? Please post them in the comment section!
If you missed my other posts on online dating, be sure to check them out:
Part I – Online Dating 101: Your Expectation
Part III – Online Dating 101: Your Opening Email

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
January 13, 2009 at 7:11 am
Online Dating 101: Your Expectation « Casual Observations
[...] Next: Online Dating 101: Your Profile Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)A Friday morning at Tuttle- Social Media Cafe, LondonQ: In your opinion, what is the key to Live Networking?Online people are real too!More People Using Internet to Hook Up … As Friends [...]
January 14, 2009 at 8:49 am
controversial1
I would consider myself to have a fairly good command of the English language and , over time, have learned how to transpose “feeling” into text. I can and have written many profiles that mimic the example provided in your post. (the first one…with substance)
What I would expect (theoretically) is exactly what you stated, that I might get more responses than the second one (lacking substance). What actually happened was ( I actually asked) the women reading my profile and subsequent conversations felt I was “too” intimidating. they ceased conversation with me because they felt I would be “too much” in reality. The man lacking substance would be moer fun to be with, whereas I would be “too” serious.
I like to “prove” to myself why things happen the way they do. I made two profiles, one “deep” and one “simple”. The simple profile did not initially attract as many replies BUT in the long run (a month) the contacts continued to converse with the “simple” me.
I don’t quite understand the logic…and it flies in the face of what most will state (like yourself) but it is what happened to me.
January 14, 2009 at 9:04 am
Ceres
@controversial1: Thanks for your comment. What you said surprised me because I find myself losing interest very quickly on profiles that don’t provide much information.
I am curious though — are there differences in the people you meet through your two different profiles? If so, do you find yourself having more in common with one set of people over the other?
Ultimately, I think different profiles attract different people. For me, I find that I have more in common with people who can express themselves well in words since I value communications in all my relationship and friendship. Which brings me to a point I want to re-stress: this series of online dating posts are written strictly from my point of view. They are, by no means, representative of all online dating experience!
January 14, 2009 at 11:33 am
controversial1
Yes, I would say that there was some differences in the people I met based on the profile used. I would say that the one’s that did respond to the profile that lacked depth, typically lacked depth themselves.
Whereas this was not originally apparent, it showed after some time. I tend to start slow and as the conversation intensifies I have more to say…not less. Taking cues from the other’s words I can steer a conversation or expand it based on what they have shown they are interested in. The respondents that lacked depth tended not to have any cues in their words after a week because they really had nothing too much to discuss, which “right or wrong” also says to me they don’t have too much thought travelling through their head at any given time either.
I was just noting my displeasure in the fact that the one’s that I really did want to talk to, the one’s that I felt had something to say, that I could learn from, grow with were the one’s that chose not to continue our conversations. the :less than desirables” would more likely listen to me (very much a one soded conversation) until the cows came home.
Just my luck, I guess! ~smile~
January 14, 2009 at 11:56 am
Ceres
@controversial1: Here is a little bit of insight I’ve learned that may help shed some light on your situation. From observing others and reflecting internally, I’ve come to the conclusion that people who have meaningful things to say in the course of a conversation tend to know themselves well (or at least better than those who don’t have interesting things to say). That’s why the conversation is engaging. Unfortunately, those who know themselves well also tend know what they want in life. More often than not, that includes the kinds of people they find interesting, attractive, etc.
So it is just your luck that those you find interesting and engaging chose not to continue your conversations. It’s not you or your conversation style, per se. It’s just that you are not quite who they have in mind. I’ve experienced that myself (from both ends). I guess that’s why we are in the dating pool — to meet people and hopefully find somebody who is compatible with us on all (or most) levels. But just as a tsunami can strike without warning, luck can turn around very quickly as well….
January 14, 2009 at 12:06 pm
controversial1
Thanks for your insight and agree with you. My time online was a few years back and eventually I decided to get off of the roller-coaster and spend my time looking in the “real” world if you will.
I was able to find someone that subsequently turned out to be a great partner, so I have no regrets in my experiences online.
If I had continued to search online I am sure that the overall effect of the almost constant rejection would have a had greater detrimental effect than being single and lonely.
I enjoyed your post…and appreciate your comments.
June 22, 2009 at 1:00 pm
Online Dating 101: Your Opening Email « Casual Observations
[...] January 21, 2009 in Just Observations, Life Experiences | Tags: dating, online dating, online dating 101 Note: This is the third of a series of posts I am writing about online dating. If you’ve missed the previous two, be sure to check them out before reading this one: Your Expectation, Your Profile. [...]